NDIS Independent Assessments
Read our submission to the Joint Standing Committee on the NDIS about the proposed Independent Assessments reform for NDIS participants.
As researchers with expertise in disability policy, we too are concerned that the introduction of IAs will be damaging to current and potential NDIS participants.
We are equally concerned that the ‘consultation’ process on this policy has not been consistent with the core principles of the scheme including co-design, choice and control.
IAs have been justified on the basis that they will lead to consistency and therefore be more equitable, concentrate function rather than medical diagnosis, and Scheme sustainability. We believe that they fail on all these objectives and that their use will exacerbate inequities in practice.
Against this background we are calling for:
- A halt to the implementation of IAs
- A commitment to release pilot data collected to date including how they were used to determine funding outcomes
- A commitment to co-produce any future functional assessment component of the scheme and its evaluation with people with disability and other stakeholders with expertise in the area including academics and allied health professionals
- A commitment to rigorous evaluation of functional assessments against their purpose of allocation of budgets for reasonable and necessary supports that meet participants’ goals
- A commitment to not use functional assessments as the sole (or main) basis of funding decisions
- A commitment to determining ‘reasonable and necessary’ support on the basis of individual goals
- A commitment to promoting equity through investment in advocacy and development of culturally appropriate services in areas of need.
Professor Anne Kavanagh, University of Melbourne
Professor Helen Dickinson, UNSW Canberra
Professor Gemma Carey, UNSW
Centre of Research Excellence in Disability and Health (CRE-DH)